Supporting integration with new health and care standards
- Written by: Rami Okasha — Care Inspectorate — Executive Director of Strategy and Improvement
- Published: 21st June 2018
If integration is the biggest change in health and social care for decades, it is going to take time to embed.
For integration to be transformational and improve the experiences of people, then organisations and systems will have to learn to work together in different ways. Across Scotland, that is happening in different ways at a local and national level.
The new health and social care standards (this link will take you away from our website), commencing in April 2018, are one of the early pieces of national policy to respond directly to the new integration arrangements. They set out what people should experience from care and support, regardless of setting or profession.
They are radically different to anything that has gone before and are designed to focus quality on the personal experience of care, firmly based on human rights and wellbeing. This world-leading approach is attracting wide and global interest in what is happening in Scotland, because of what the standards looks like and how they were developed.
The first national care standards in Scotland were introduced almost seventeen years ago – but only focused on registered care and independent health services. They were largely designed to set minimum expectations for providers and tied closely to the regulatory and inspection approaches of the time. The new standards quite literally turn this on their head, in three main ways.
First, the outcomes are decoupled from settings. Instead of separate standards for care homes, hospitals, children’s services, there is a common set of outcomes across all care. The standards are relevant for planning, commissioning, assessment and care delivery. This is to allow coherence and improvement activity at every level and is important as services are increasingly planned in an integrated way. The standards are relevant across health and social care – services that are integrated, services that are not, early learning and childcare, children’s services, social work, the National Health Service, and community justice. The extensive public involvement of people in developing the standards shows that people want a consistently high quality service regardless of setting. They want to be treated with dignity and respect. They want to experience compassion and kindness from those supporting them. They generally want to be involved in leading their own care and want that care to be responsive to their rights, needs and choices.
Second, the standards are person-led, deliberately pushing the boundary of person-centeredness towards something even more empowering. Virtually all the statements start with “I experience…” or “I am…”. They locate quality firmly through the lens of the person experiencing care. This is empowering for people who may be in unfamiliar or distressing environments and is designed to ensure care professionals reflect on their practice from the perspective of the person.
Third, they are outcome-focused, describing what the consequence of good care should be, not how it should be delivered. Detailed and technical inputs about staff ratios and nutritional intake are replaced by outcome indicators, reflecting that people’s needs, wants and choices are not always the same. For example, a previous descriptor about the minimum square footage of a care home room is replaced by a new descriptor which states “I have enough physical space to meet my needs and wishes”.
Of course, it is very easy to plan and measure to a minimum square footage of a room; it is harder to plan care in a way which is tailored to people’s individual needs. But the new standards are not designed for the convenience of inspectors or professionals. Instead of telling care and support providers what to do, they describe what people should experience as a result of that care and support.
Inputs characteristic of high-quality care will continue to be described in guidance, practice notes and peer-reviewed research. That is how we create a learning and improving system. The assessment of quality, however, becomes whether the experience and outcomes for people are positive. This radical approach means inspectors cannot rely on lists of policies and inputs to check, and practitioners cannot assume their inspections will be positive just by following processes. Practitioners are released to creatively solve problems and innovate to improve. The new standards are designed so practitioners can plan, do, study, act. Inspectors no longer see whether something is done ‘correctly’, but instead ask ‘how successful is this change in improving experiences and outcomes for people?’
This change of thinking is part of a broad shift towards measuring the success of public services by reference to outcomes; that is, the impact they are having of people, rather than the way they are designed and delivered. In health and social care, this releases professionals from having to “do what the regulator says”, and instead fosters innovation. To ensure that people experience the high quality envisaged by the standards, care staff will need to work closely together and with people experiencing care to plan, innovate, change and improve.
The new standards were published in 2017 and are implemented from April 2018. Scrutiny bodies have structured programmes in place to incorporate the standards into inspection and improvement activity from 2018 onwards. Over time, a common set of standards across care will allow people to understand what they should experience, and practitioners to devise innovative and high-quality ways of ensuring they do.
We should not fall into the trap of thinking that because standards have been published, they will immediately become a lived reality for every citizen. If everyone experienced care that was already consistent with the standards, there would be no need for them. Standards which are focused on outcomes are about improvement, not compliance. Their applicability across such a wide range of sectors is an important part of the integration of health and social care.
Rami can be found on Twitter at @RamiOkasha (this link will take you away from our website).
Rami’s Opinion is part of the ALLIANCE’s ‘We Need To Talk About Integration’ anthology which is available at the link below.
End of page.
You may also like:
‘This is such a beautiful way to bring in an element that's vital to someone's happiness.’ Professional Care Partner.
Continue readingA lived experience perspective is needed to develop services and amplify the voices of unpaid carers of all ages in Highland.
Continue readingKelly Muir reflects on the barriers for people with no recourse to public funds when accessing the right to health.
Continue readingSelf Management Programme Manager Grace reflects on the fifteenth anniversary of Gaun Yersel, the Self Management Strategy for Scotland.
Continue readingAutomated reminder emails to users have started, following the most recent technical improvements to ALISS.
Continue readingFor many the nightmare of Long Covid is something they live with every day.
Continue readingPromoting rights awareness through accessible information and the voice of lived experience.
Continue readingThe third sector’s economic contribution and development seems to be too often overlooked.
Continue readingDigital Assistant Director, Chris Mackie reflects how the lack of an appropriate sticker led to the destruction of medical records.
Continue reading"Because no one put a sticker on them."
Continue readingWhy it matters to you to participate in the public consultation on 'A draft outline Charter of Rights for People Affected by Substance Use'.
Continue readingDr Tony Robertson reflects on how we make the right to health a reality for everyone.
Continue readingOver 12 million people live with Congenital Heart Disease globally with a population of 20,000 in Scotland.
Continue readingRory Chapman (Development Officer) reflects on the What Matters to You National Networking Event
Continue readingGiving unique insights into individual's lives, experiences, needs, and sense of character.
Continue readingReflections on a Self Management Reflective Practice (SMRP) session, from a Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland Advice and Support Practitioner.
Continue readingLucy highlights some ALLIANCE human rights activity from this year and to mark Human Rights Day 2023.
Continue readingChief Executive of Scottish Care, Donald Macaskill, critically reflects on the Winter Preparedness Plan.
Continue readingCalum reflects on the Community Partnership Conference 2023 in Inverness, which was built on trusting relationships and partnership working.
Continue readingSelf Management Network Scotland members Foundation for Positive Mental Health on how their free app can help with workforce wellbeing.
Continue readingHannah Tweed asks, “what next?” and calls for action from Scottish Government on the findings of the National Audiology Review.
Continue reading"Modern football clubs have a responsibility to engage with and take care of the communities they represent".
Continue readingMark Ballard outlines writes that it is time for the Scottish Government to act on the National Audiology Review
Continue readingCalum reflects on the Design HOPES launch event and the value that the third sector can add to the potentially world-leading project.
Continue readingSenior Development Officer for the Children and Young People Programme reflects on the current nature of funding in the sector.
Continue reading