Report urges action on human rights and the devolution framework
- Area of Work: Policy and Research
- Type: News Item
- Published: 19th April 2024

Amendments to the Scotland Act are necessary to ensure the Scottish Parliament can fully incorporate human rights in devolved areas.
A new report published by the Human Rights Consortium Scotland (HRCS) has set out the range of options available to maximise the scope of the upcoming Human Rights Bill. The paper, by Professor Aileen McHarg, Professor in Public Law and Human Rights at Durham University, highlights the significant negative implications that the Supreme Court decision on the United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Bill has for the incorporation of human rights in devolved areas.
In October 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that parts of the UNCRC Bill were outside the Scottish Parliament’s powers, and that the duties under the Bill could not be applied to Acts of the UK Parliament relating to devolved issues. This required the Scottish Government to amend the Bill and bring it back to Parliament for reconsideration, with the amended Bill passing unanimously in December 2023.
A significant amount of relevant legislation, notably the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, pre-dates devolution and therefore fell out of the scope of the amended UNCRC Bill (now Act). In the paper, Professor McHarg describes the Supreme Court’s decision as “incoherent” and a “wholly unexpected” limitation on the Scottish Parliament’s powers, and the final form of the UNCRC Act as “narrower”, “much more complicated” and “essentially arbitrary” in scope.
The upcoming Human Rights Bill is similarly constrained by this decision, with acts including the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 and National Health (Scotland) Act 1978 leaving key human rights areas outwith the scope of the Bill. Professor McHarg’s recommended solution is for the UK Government to amend the Scotland Act to reverse the effect of the Supreme Court decision, either by deleting the relevant section entirely, or adding a new section that clarifies the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
The paper also sets out alternative solutions to widen the scope of the Human Rights Bill, but considers many of these to be risky, such as extending procedural duties, or time consuming, for example consolidating existing UK Parliament originated legislation into new Scottish Parliament legislation.
The ALLIANCE strongly supports a maximalist approach to human rights incorporation in Scotland, and are particularly concerned at the potential limitations on incorporating the UN Convention on the Rights of Disabled People (UNCRPD). We urge both the UK and Scottish Governments to carefully consider Professor McHarg’s paper, and all parties to commit to ensuring that the Human Rights Bill has the widest possible scope to protect and uphold everyone’s rights in law.
You can read the full report on the HRCS website here.
End of page.
You may also like:
Have your say in the draft 'Quality prescribing for Chronic Pain: a guide for improvement 2026-2029'.
Continue reading70% of disabled women reported feeling worse off financially compared to last year.
Continue readingA partnership of organisations including the ALLIANCE have issued an open statement on what's needed to urgently tackle health inequalities.
Continue readingA new plan to make sure everyone in Scotland gets the right care and support at the end of life
Continue readingNew research has highlighted the significant financial and social challenges faced by people living with Long COVID across Scotland.
Continue readingThe amendment aims to close a loophole that leaves people in outsourced mental health care without guaranteed human rights protections.
Continue readingThe resources come from a partnership between the ALLIANCE, Public Health Scotland, and the University of Strathclyde.
Continue readingThe research explores the experiences of people with Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) navigating the welfare benefits system.
Continue readingPublic Health Scotland is consulting on its new 10-year strategy.
Continue readingTwo years after the Independent Review of Audiology Services in Scotland, the ALLIANCE asks: Where are we?
Continue readingSPSO updates complaints handling principles to support a positive, learning-focused culture around raising and resolving complaints.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE welcomes the Scottish Government and Social Security Scotland’s publication of the Seldom-Heard Groups Action Plan 2025-26.
Continue readingPHS are looking for input into their strategy for the next ten years, which will aim to support increasing life expectancy.
Continue readingThe report recommends changes and improvements to Adult Disability Payment including reforming the 50% and 20 metre rules.
Continue readingA balance between overarching and condition-specific actions must be underpinned by a human rights based approach.
Continue readingAn independent analysis of over 100 responses to the Scottish Government consultation has been published.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE responds to a Scottish Government consultation on draft guidance for teachers
Continue readingThe paper sets out the Government's thoughts on the proposed Human Rights Bill.
Continue readingProposals to cut disability payments and a lack of consideration for devolution are amongst the serious issues in the plans.
Continue readingThe Scottish Government has recognised a formal definition of Deafblindness.
Continue readingQualifications Scotland must think about the needs of pupils who use British Sign Language.
Continue readingThe Health, Social Care and Sport Committee is seeking views from both organisations and people with lived experience.
Continue readingMore than 100 charities unite to say Scottish MPs must stand against social security cuts.
Continue readingALLIANCE survey finds people are facing multiple barriers accessing SDS
Continue readingThe plan is intended to improve the lives of disabled people and put their experiences and concerns at the heart of policymaking.
Continue reading