National Care Service Bill Stage 2 Call for Views – ALLIANCE response
- Area of Work: Policy and Research, Social Care
- Type: News Item
- Published: 17th September 2024

The ALLIANCE support the principles of a National Care Service however the Bill requires substantial amendments to deliver what people need.
The ALLIANCE has submitted a response to the National Care Service Bill Stage 2 Call for Views highlighting our member’s feedback on the proposed amendments.
The ALLIANCE welcomes the Committee giving people and organisations an opportunity to comment on the Scottish Government’s draft Stage 2 amendments through the Call for Views. Although this is unusual and represents a departure from usual Parliamentary procedure, it is appropriate due to the significant changes since the Bill was introduced.
We support the principle of the creation of a National Care Service. The NCS offers an opportunity to improve people’s experiences of rights based, person centred social care – if designed and implemented in a way that responds to the concerns and experiences of people accessing social care and the workforce, and the recommendations in the Independent Review of Adult Social Care.
However, we believe that the Bill as introduced requires substantial amendments at Stage 2 if it is to deliver improvements to the rights based, person centred social care that people need.
As detailed in this response, whilst a number of the Scottish Government’s amendments are welcome, they would not fully deliver these improvements. We are concerned that three years on from the original Scottish Government consultation, and more than two years since the Bill was introduced, a considerable amount of detail of how the NCS would operate in practice remains unclear. Our members have consistently reported difficulty in engaging with the Bill, due to this lack of detail and clarity.
The ALLIANCE participated in the Scottish Government’s Expert Legislative Advisory Group which provided comment ahead of the publication of the draft Stage 2 amendments. However, as we told the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, we would want to take the opportunity to make it clear that our participation should not be taken as an indication that we are necessarily supportive of all the Scottish Government amendments or have co-designed them. We did not have sight of the text of the amendments prior to them being shared with the Committee, and this response should be taken as the ALLIANCE’s views on them.
As stated in the Independent Review of Adult Social Care, the National Care Service should ensure that everyone in Scotland gets the social care support they need to live their lives as they choose and to be active citizens. The National Care Service should enable us to work together by promoting and ensuring human rights, wellbeing, independent living and equity.
Read our response in full below.
End of page.
You may also like:
Young people’s feedback will help NHS 24 better understand needs and improve support services.
Continue readingALLIANCE input and lived experience evidence help shape stronger, person-centred and trauma-informed maternity care
Continue readingSupporting stronger information rights, while warning delivery must work for an already stretched sector
Continue readingA new resource by Adaptation Scotland to help social care professionals integrate climate adaptation into care planning and delivery.
Continue readingRead more about the ALLIANCE response to the report on the impact of COVID-19 on the health and social care sector in Scotland.
Continue readingUp to £20 million to be delivered via Independent Living Fund to help people live in their communities
Continue readingRefined plans focus on practical measure to improve outcomes for people with learning disabilities, autism and neurodivergence.
Continue readingMarie Curie has published new analysis showing that almost one in three people in Scotland die without the palliative care they need.
Continue readingShare your views before 19 February
Continue readingReform of the council tax system is long overdue, with the current system negatively impacting funding for services including social care.
Continue readingFirst monitoring report shows improvements in wellbeing and services alongside ongoing gaps in data and unequal outcomes
Continue readingProgress in many areas is welcome, but the budget must go further on social care, mental health and third sector support.
Continue readingThe 'joint statement on prevention' partners have issued a follow-up ahead of the 2026-27 Scottish Budget.
Continue readingEvent calls for human rights to be a priority ahead of the Scottish Parliament Elections in 2026.
Continue readingCommission raises concerns over the state of economic, social and cultural rights in Scotland
Continue readingNew online platform invites individuals and communities to shape Scotland’s path to net zero
Continue readingA survey of ALLIANCE third sector members found a worsening financial crisis arising from a range of pressures.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE has produced a briefing for the Scottish Parliament debate on BSL, taking place on 11 December 2025.
Continue readingScottish Government outline actions in response to economic, social and cultural rights observations
The plan comes in response to the Concluding Observations from the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights earlier this year.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE urges stronger social care integration, a clearer prevention focus and digital inclusion at the heart of NHS Delivery proposals
Continue readingNearly half of unpaid carers cut back on essentials as financial and health pressures intensify
Continue readingNew report warns thousands spending their final months in financial hardship and fuel poverty
Continue readingIndependent expert panel review recommends major changes to align abortion law with modern clinical practice
Continue readingALLIANCE and Engender call for an intersectional and rights-based approach to underpin a national investigation into maternity services.
Continue readingThe response welcomes ambition of draft standards but identifies key gaps in inclusion and communication
Continue reading