Not as well as they should, if the ALLIANCE’s research is anything to go by.

It seems like a while ago now, but earlier this year we carried out a small enquiry into people’s awareness, understanding and experiences of Self-directed Support (SDS). The results were published in June (‘Personal Experiences of Self-directed Support’), but are still yielding pertinent and revealing data. We’re in the process of sifting out information related to specific groups, and the first in the series is our briefing on SDS and Women (Women’s Experiences of SDS).

By looking in greater depth at women’s responses to our research, the ALLIANCE aims to gain a better understanding of how women engage with and experience the process. It is our contribution to what we hope will be a growing body of evidence to help improve SDS policy and practice.  One of our main concerns is that there is a gap in robust, national qualitative data on SDS, including women’s experiences.

Our short survey and focused interviews show there’s a very mixed picture for women, depending on who you are and what you use SDS for. It is very encouraging that women’s satisfaction with social care increased by around 16 per cent following the introduction of SDS. However, half of our female respondents said they did not feel they have enough support to meet their requirements and waiting times for SDS packages are unacceptably high.

The ALLIANCE is concerned that SDS is not being implemented according to its rights-based values and principles and will therefore not achieve transformational change in social care culture and services or help improve people’s lives. Specific equalities and traditionally marginalised groups – in this case women – are at great risk of being overlooked when they require targeted and tailored approaches.

As Emma Trottier of Engender, who kindly wrote the Forward to our briefing paper, notes: “Health and social care services, and decisions over their management, have a major impact on women, and ignoring women’s unique needs and realities inhibits social policies from being realised for half of Scotland’s population.”

We’ve learned a lot from carrying out this research, which we hope to continue to improve and repeat as a way to monitor how people’s experiences of SDS – as well as the facts and figures – improve over time. Keep an eye out for more targeted briefings, including older people and unpaid carers, which should be published soon.


End of page.

You may also like:

Written by: Sara Redmond, Chief Officer Published: 12/10/2026

In her latest TFN column, our Chief Officer Sara Redmond reflects on the proposal to collapse Scotland's 14 regional health boards into two.

Continue reading
Written by: Chigozie Joe‎‎‎‎‏‏‎‎‎‎‎-Adigwe, Digital Network Officer Published: 06/10/2026

Gozie reflects on supporting citizen engagement, digital inclusion and hopes for the future.

Continue reading
Written by: Dr Yasmin Zaidy, BSLM: Live Well East Lothian Published: 30/09/2026

GLP-1s can transform health but without adequate wraparound support, weight loss may come at the cost of nutrition, muscle and wellbeing.

Continue reading
Written by: Billy McClean, Chief Officer, Renfrewshire Health and Social Care Partnership Published: 10/09/2026

Billy McClean reflects on why SCIC26 offers a vital opportunity to learn together, share what works, and shape the future of integrated care

Continue reading
Written by: Bruce Adamson, Chief Executive Officer, Scottish Commission for Learning Disability (SCLD) Published: 07/09/2026

To mark Scottish Learning Disability Week (7 - 13 September), Bruce Adamson reflects on this year's call to action.

Continue reading
Back to all opinions