Leveraging the experiences of people with Long Covid to generate better research
- Written by: Nick Sculthorpe — School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland
- Published: 21st March 2022
Nick Sculthorpe reflects on pacing, co-production, and Long Covid.
For many people, infection with COVID-19, while unpleasant, is thankfully relatively short-lived, but for others, symptoms persist for far longer. Cases of individuals experiencing symptoms, months after infection, are frequently reported. Initially referred to as “long haulers”, reflecting the duration over which the symptoms persisted, the name “Long Covid” was later coined by those with the condition. The fact that the name came from the Long Covid community and that they have largely resisted attempts to rename it (e.g. post-covid syndrome) speaks to their engagement with researchers and medics. I want to make the case that researchers should capitalise on this engagement using public patient involvement to improve the quality, relevance, and impact of their work.
Our work focuses on fatigue as the most common and debilitating symptom. In Long Covid, fatigue is better described as a cluster of symptoms, including complete mental and physical exhaustion, far out of proportion to any effort that preceded it. The phenomenon is commonly referred to as “Post Exertional Malaise”.[i] The only real help for PEM is extended rest, and the best approach is to try to avoid PEM in the first place using a technique called pacing. When pacing, individuals aim to manage their energy demands by matching what they do with their available energy. While pacing sounds simple, it can be extremely challenging and when we talked with people with Long Covid many reported finding it difficult. It requires keeping track of some poorly defined concepts, such as how much energy you feel you have, how much you think you have expended, and how much the tasks you want to do might take. PEM might also occur several days after an activity, meaning the individual must track all of this information over many days, and all while trying to simultaneously manage “brain fog”.
Our pacing study aims to use activity trackers to reduce the overhead required to pace well. Trackers themselves are of limited use in pacing (since they promote extra activity). However, by reprocessing the data, we can provide better information about activity levels throughout the day and send alerts messages when participants risk doing too much. Also, because the data is stored, we can review activity levels for several days before a bout of PEM to help identify a likely trigger. Of course, activity tracking is not the whole answer. Cognitively challenging activities such as focused reading and writing, or emotionally draining activities such as family visits (or emergencies), are likely to contribute to PEM while being broadly invisible to activity tracking. Nevertheless, by helping to manage the areas where activity tracking works, we hope to create a little more headroom so those other factors are perhaps less debilitating.
As we developed our study, we were exceptionally fortunate that people with lived experience of Long Covid were prepared to give their time and energy to help. Early in its development, we spoke with Long Covid Scotland to make sure our research addressed questions that are important to people with Long Covid, and they continue to help us have regular public patient involvement meetings. Their experience, advice, and suggestions have informed everything from the big themes such as initially identifying the difficulties with pacing, all the way through to of how our app displays activity information. As a result, we have a better study that addresses a question that matters to people with Long Covid and does so in a way that they are likely to find acceptable.
Similarly, our app sends alert messages when people are at risk of doing too much. Aside from the technicalities of ensuring these alerts are delivered at the correct time, equally important is the wording of the message itself. In our experience, messaging needs to be easy to understand but not condescending while also being aware of the experiences of the intended recipients. We also need a lot of different messages that meet these criteria, as participants tend to disengage when they repeatedly receive the same message. It turns out that this is not easy to do well, especially for a team of researchers who do not have Long Covid.
Again, we turned to people with lived experience for help. In this case, we asked the ME/CFS community, a group that have experience using pacing to manage their symptoms, to tell us what they wished they had known when they started pacing. The result was overwhelming, and we received hundreds of tips and hints to help with the realities of pacing day-to-day. These co-produced ideas now form the basis of our alert messages. They are more varied, more practical, and critically, far more authentic than our research team would have been able to produce. These characteristics mean they are more likely to be understood and acted upon by the recipients, which in turn increases the likelihood of the intervention being beneficial. It also means the research funding is more likely to return some benefit for the investment.
Both of these examples demonstrate why good public patient involvement benefits everyone. In our case, the support has improved our research by providing a context for the questions we should ask and ensuring that we focus on problems that are important to those living with the condition. In the case of our alerts, not only are the messages better, public patient involvement has made us aware of new approaches to working that will benefit future research.
Public patient involvement informed research is not new and has been increasing in importance for over a decade. Nevertheless, ensuring that those with the condition can contribute to the design and development of research remains critically important to address real-world problems with high quality, challenge-led research.
For more information on the pacing project, or to get involved, visit the project website (this link will take you away from our website).
[i] PEM is a contested term, and for a good reason. Researchers are slowly adopting better names such as post-exertional neuroimmune exhaustion (PENE). However, it remains the most commonly used term, so it is included here.
End of document.
End of page.
You may also like:
Kelly Muir reflects on the barriers for people with no recourse to public funds when accessing the right to health.
Continue readingSelf Management Programme Manager Grace reflects on the fifteenth anniversary of Gaun Yersel, the Self Management Strategy for Scotland.
Continue readingAutomated reminder emails to users have started, following the most recent technical improvements to ALISS.
Continue readingFor many the nightmare of Long Covid is something they live with every day.
Continue readingPromoting rights awareness through accessible information and the voice of lived experience.
Continue readingThe third sector’s economic contribution and development seems to be too often overlooked.
Continue readingDigital Assistant Director, Chris Mackie reflects how the lack of an appropriate sticker led to the destruction of medical records.
Continue reading"Because no one put a sticker on them."
Continue readingWhy it matters to you to participate in the public consultation on 'A draft outline Charter of Rights for People Affected by Substance Use'.
Continue readingDr Tony Robertson reflects on how we make the right to health a reality for everyone.
Continue readingOver 12 million people live with Congenital Heart Disease globally with a population of 20,000 in Scotland.
Continue readingRory Chapman (Development Officer) reflects on the What Matters to You National Networking Event
Continue readingGiving unique insights into individual's lives, experiences, needs, and sense of character.
Continue readingReflections on a Self Management Reflective Practice (SMRP) session, from a Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland Advice and Support Practitioner.
Continue readingLucy highlights some ALLIANCE human rights activity from this year and to mark Human Rights Day 2023.
Continue readingChief Executive of Scottish Care, Donald Macaskill, critically reflects on the Winter Preparedness Plan.
Continue readingCalum reflects on the Community Partnership Conference 2023 in Inverness, which was built on trusting relationships and partnership working.
Continue readingSelf Management Network Scotland members Foundation for Positive Mental Health on how their free app can help with workforce wellbeing.
Continue readingHannah Tweed asks, “what next?” and calls for action from Scottish Government on the findings of the National Audiology Review.
Continue reading"Modern football clubs have a responsibility to engage with and take care of the communities they represent".
Continue readingMark Ballard outlines writes that it is time for the Scottish Government to act on the National Audiology Review
Continue readingCalum reflects on the Design HOPES launch event and the value that the third sector can add to the potentially world-leading project.
Continue readingSenior Development Officer for the Children and Young People Programme reflects on the current nature of funding in the sector.
Continue readingDirect support to disabled people, people living with long term conditions and unpaid carers would be wiser use of funds.
Continue readingThe essential role integration has to play in delivering the Scottish Government's Value Based Health and Care Action Plan.
Continue reading