What do human rights mean in a pandemic?
- Written by: Colin McKay — Centre for Mental Health and Capacity Law, Edinburgh Napier University
- Published: 28th April 2020
Colin explains why making human rights real is vital in relation to COVID-19.
On 23 April, the Scottish Government published its ‘Coronavirus (COVID-19): framework for decision making’ (this link will take you away from our website). I was glad to see protecting human rights repeatedly emphasised as being central to the Government’s approach.
That’s no small thing, and I am sure the Government is sincere. But in my experience of health and social care, it can be easier to state a commitment to human rights than to demonstrate how a human rights based approach makes a difference to what you do.
Making human rights real is even more vital now, when COVID-19 disproportionately affects groups including older people, people with disabilities, and people without secure homes; and when services are being diverted to coping with the epidemic.
International human rights bodies have issued a range of guidance on the human rights implications of the emergency [Note 1] . Key principles include:
- The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental human right of all, which should be achieved without discrimination
- A state of emergency, or any other security measures, should be guided by human rights principles: measures should be based on law, objectively justified and proportionate
- States should prevent discriminatory denial of health care on the basis of disability
- States must ensure that persons with disabilities are actively involved in the implementation and monitoring of COVID-19 measures.
These have been supplemented by powerful statements by UK and Scottish disabled people’s organisations and allies [2]. Human rights principles have already successfully been used to challenge discriminatory approaches.
In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued guidance on access to critical care which advised clinicians to use the ‘Clinical Frailty Scale’. Following a threat of judicial review, this was amended to make clear that this scale should not be used in younger people, people with stable long-term disabilities, learning disabilities or autism (this link will take you away from our website).
Another major concern was that the legislation restricting people from leaving home would have a disproportionate effect on people with autism and other conditions. The guidance has now made clear that people with a medical need to do so, including people with learning disabilities or autism, may leave home more often (this link will take you away from our website).
However, there is more to do. The Scottish Government has issued Clinical Guidance (this link will take you away from our website) and an Ethical Advice and Support Framework (this link will take you away from our website) which have been criticised by the Scottish Human Rights Commission, the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and the Centre for Mental Health and Capacity Law, for not providing clear guidance on the requirements of human rights.
In particular, much more needs to be said about ensuring that decisions about who should get particular treatments are not made in a discriminatory way, that judgements about quality of life are not based on the presence of a disability, and that the wishes and views of the patient are fully taken into account.
This is particularly important in advance care planning. There is huge concern that people may be encouraged to agree documents stating that they should not be resuscitated in the event of a cardiac arrest, or admitted to critical care, or even to hospital. People should be able to set out what they want and do not want should they become severely ill – but they should be supported to set out their informed wishes, not feel pressurised into signing off a decision which is effectively taken by others.
That is not just good care – it is a human rights obligation [3].
It is welcome that the First Minister has confirmed that people should not be pushed into agreeing a DNACPR form, but we have still to see clear guidance about how advance care planning should operate in the situation we are in.
The pandemic has also led to legal changes reducing the obligations on local authorities to assess needs, and the reduction or withdrawal of many care and support services. Difficult decisions must be made. A human-rights based approach does not seek to deny that, but to ensure that the way we take decisions truly respects ‘the inherent dignity and equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family ’ [4].
This Opinion is part of a specially commissioned series by the ALLIANCE’s Academy programme looking at COVID-19 and the Five Provocations for the Future of Health and Social Care.
Notes
[1] Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Statement on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and economic, social and cultural rights (this link will take you away from our website)
Joint Statement: Persons with Disabilities and COVID-19 (this link will take you away from our website) by the Chair of the UNCRPD and the Special Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General on Disability and Accessibility
[2] https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2020/april/covid-19-and-rights-disabled-people (this link will take you away from our website); and https://inclusionscotland.org/silc-statement-on-nhs-and-rights-of-disabled-people (this link will take you away from our website) .
[3] In particular, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and Article 12 of the UNCRPD.
[4] Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
End of page.
You may also like:
Crohn’s and Colitis care in Scotland is at a pivotal moment. Urgent action is needed to tackle delays and poor access to vital services
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE’s Lewis Shaw reflects on the importance of rehabilitation support.
Continue readingIsabella Goldie of Deafblind Scotland reflects on the value of partnership work.
Continue readingFind out more about the inaugural Power of Attorney Day taking place on 22 April 2026.
Continue readingDr Hannah Tweed reflects on 20 years of the Scottish Sensory Hub, the important work they do and why it matters.
Continue readingAs part of our 20 year anniversary, Kerry shares her reflections on how far the ALLIANCE has come, our achievements, and our impact.
Continue readingIn her latest TFN column, our Chief Officer Sara Redmond reflects on 20 years since Scotland moved to put children at the centre of policy.
Continue readingCancer care in Scotland is at a critical moment. Macmillan is calling for urgent action ahead of the parliamentary elections in May
Continue readingMhairi Campbell reflects on Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) not being recognised as having a severe impact on life.
Continue readingLucy Mulvagh shares how she used the Centre for Public Policy Practice Fellowship to examine prevention and its barriers to implementation
Continue readingLaura from Perth and Kinross HSCP shares how we can celebrate World Social Work Day through the lens of 'What Matters To You?'.
Continue readingReflections on the Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education) Bill
Continue readingLouise Hall from Pain Association Scotland reflects on the event she delivered as part of Self Management Week 2025.
Continue readingAct Now for Autistic Rights calls for a transformative Bill for autistic and neurodiverse communities
Continue readingIn the next decade, the role of digital in health and social care must embed our digital human rights principles to reduce inequalities.
Continue readingRead some reflections from ALLIANCE colleagues, who had the opportunity to sponsor and attend Scotland's Annual Human Rights Conference.
Continue reading“Our Collective Voice” is a hopeful vision for the next five years, and I encourage ALLIANCE members to bring it into their own campaigns.
Continue readingBy standing together, we can help ensure that everyone in Scotland has access to the compassionate, high quality palliative care.
Continue readingALLIANCE Scottish Sensory Hub Manager Dr Hannah Tweed reflects on the launch of the BSL network for public bodies.
Continue readingSimone Janse van Rensburg reflects on the impact of their Women Living Well event which featured as part of Self Management Week 2025.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE’s Women’s Health Lived Experience Group reflect on their input to Phase 2 of the Scottish Government’s Women’s Health Plan.
Continue readingWellbeing Scotland’s Chief Clinical Officer Ashleigh Ronald highlights why we must shift stigmatising narratives around child abuse.
Continue readingAs we mark twenty years of the ALLIANCE, Person Centred Voices continues to show the power of listening, kindness and connection.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE’s Women’s Health Lived Experience Group reflect on their input to Phase 2 of the Scottish Government’s Women’s Health Plan.
Continue readingThe ALLIANCE’s Women’s Health Lived Experience Group reflect on their input to Phase 2 of the Scottish Government’s Women’s Health Plan.
Continue reading